The thoughts I speak of go a little (a lot) like this...
a) Cancel all my plans, all of them, the wedding? yes, cancel that too. And phone Easyjet (we are still in a recession people) book me onto the next flight to Normandy. Pack the nut cracker, I have some business to attend to with a French photographer and his lens. You thought Liam Neeson was Taken angry (see what I did there), you wait!
And...
b) Is the Princess a part of the Itty Bitty Titty committee too? Did Pip get the bun and Kate get the baps? C'mon Google, load!!
The morning the pictures were published most hearts sank. Some refused to look. The palace hit back, labelling the decision to print the snaps 'grotesque and unjustifiable' (not Kate's boobs - it has been said that insiders reacted to the size surprisingly well - they thought they were smaller) And with this, I do agree. Kate did not ask to be shoved into a corner with the likes of Harry Styles, Chris Brown, Gaga...Dappy! She did not pose in the bathroom mirror with the intention of sending a modern day love letter to Wills. She was on holiday, seeking the relaxation only a break away can supply.
The morning the pictures were published most hearts sank. Some refused to look. The palace hit back, labelling the decision to print the snaps 'grotesque and unjustifiable' (not Kate's boobs - it has been said that insiders reacted to the size surprisingly well - they thought they were smaller) And with this, I do agree. Kate did not ask to be shoved into a corner with the likes of Harry Styles, Chris Brown, Gaga...Dappy! She did not pose in the bathroom mirror with the intention of sending a modern day love letter to Wills. She was on holiday, seeking the relaxation only a break away can supply.
Now, whilst whether the soulless pap has a penis left to call his own or not is neither here nor there. Let's face it, the bugger will be bought to justice, he cannot high five his mates over his lengthy lens forever. What is our concern however is if she has a nice pair or pears. NO *get's game face on*. Our concern is whether we agree with Closer Magazine's choice to publish the pictures for all to see. OR if we even give a teeny tiny rats arse.
Yes, the Princess has boobs, as does 50% of the population (disregarding manboobs here, Gervais, Jabba, Rodriguez you are all safe) Yes they may be suitably covered from the public eye and no we haven't seen even a glimpse of side boob but, they are there.
If she fancies giving them a good sunning then why the hell not!? After all, as our future Queen don't we expect a good coverage when it comes to a tan? If a tan line was to be seen there is no doubt that it would grace the pages of our glossy magazines contained within a red circle of shame, either that or the front pages, a la Harry.
I am not saying she should wack on a pair of nipple tassels and prance around to Carly Rae, she shouldn't. As should no one. Nor should she be in the running for a bed in the Playboy mansion under the arm of the Heff himself, wearing a silk dressing gown. I am not even saying that we should expect to see her in FHM, Nuts or Zoo taking one for the team and giving the lads an eyefull (or maybe not) in the process.
If we were back in the school playground Kate would have been on the canteen table with the likes of Princess Diana, The Queen and Mother Teresa. Yes, her duty is to serve her Queen and her county, to help other people and to keep The Guide Law but, we need to face up to something folks and hold on to your crown jewels cause this is a biggin', she is still human and as a human, isn't it customary that she considers the need for an even tan? After all, our Princess if HOT so yank the stick outta ya behind and deal with it.
But not everyone agrees. I was asked to whip up this post by a friend of mine on a social networking site (Facebook - tried to sound fancy), her post sparked a mini debate and the following comment:
You sign up to be the most media-covered woman in the world and you sign up to saying goodbye to luxuries like the privacy of going topless outdoors is what I say. In any case, I've seen bigger and better breasts on johnny vegas xx
As controversial as this may be, she has a point. But did she sign up? A prenup? probably. But was there a clause marked 'Topless Sunbathing Agreement' paragraph six, section four? probably not.
Do I agree with the comment above, no not really. We are all entitled to privacy even, though it pains me to say it, Justin Bieber. We have seen the private parts of a number of famous faces now and y'know what? They are not made of gold, they are not encrusted with Diamonds, they do not glow in the dark nor do they turn into a sat-nav to help you find your way home after one too many at The Dog and Duck. They are normal, so let's move on...
After all, just thank your lucky stars it wasn't the Queen.
If she fancies giving them a good sunning then why the hell not!? After all, as our future Queen don't we expect a good coverage when it comes to a tan? If a tan line was to be seen there is no doubt that it would grace the pages of our glossy magazines contained within a red circle of shame, either that or the front pages, a la Harry.
I am not saying she should wack on a pair of nipple tassels and prance around to Carly Rae, she shouldn't. As should no one. Nor should she be in the running for a bed in the Playboy mansion under the arm of the Heff himself, wearing a silk dressing gown. I am not even saying that we should expect to see her in FHM, Nuts or Zoo taking one for the team and giving the lads an eyefull (or maybe not) in the process.
If we were back in the school playground Kate would have been on the canteen table with the likes of Princess Diana, The Queen and Mother Teresa. Yes, her duty is to serve her Queen and her county, to help other people and to keep The Guide Law but, we need to face up to something folks and hold on to your crown jewels cause this is a biggin', she is still human and as a human, isn't it customary that she considers the need for an even tan? After all, our Princess if HOT so yank the stick outta ya behind and deal with it.
But not everyone agrees. I was asked to whip up this post by a friend of mine on a social networking site (Facebook - tried to sound fancy), her post sparked a mini debate and the following comment:
You sign up to be the most media-covered woman in the world and you sign up to saying goodbye to luxuries like the privacy of going topless outdoors is what I say. In any case, I've seen bigger and better breasts on johnny vegas xx
As controversial as this may be, she has a point. But did she sign up? A prenup? probably. But was there a clause marked 'Topless Sunbathing Agreement' paragraph six, section four? probably not.
Do I agree with the comment above, no not really. We are all entitled to privacy even, though it pains me to say it, Justin Bieber. We have seen the private parts of a number of famous faces now and y'know what? They are not made of gold, they are not encrusted with Diamonds, they do not glow in the dark nor do they turn into a sat-nav to help you find your way home after one too many at The Dog and Duck. They are normal, so let's move on...
After all, just thank your lucky stars it wasn't the Queen.
No comments:
Post a Comment